Spotlight and Briefings

Back to feed

Navigate 7-day Briefings

2026-05-22 - 2026-05-28 ← Older
2026-06-03 - 2026-06-09 Newer →

Two scoping reviews highlight gaps in return-to-sport decision-making: psychological readiness under-assessed in hamstring rehabilitation, clearance criteria lack standardization after shoulder stabilization.

7 day briefing • 2026-05-29 - 2026-06-04 (5 days ago) • frozen

Spotlight this

This week's major contributions come from two scoping reviews published in the sports medicine literature. The first, a synthesis of 29 studies on return to sport (RTS) after anterior shoulder stabilization (Bankart and Latarjet), found that while 82.3% of competitive athletes returned to pre-injury sport, clearance decisions varied widely. Only 45% of studies used objective strength or range-of-motion testing, and few incorporated functional or psychological readiness assessments.

Latarjet was associated with lower recurrent instability (3.1%) compared to Bankart (9.2%). The second review focused on psychosocial factors affecting RTS after hamstring strain injuries, analyzing 10 studies (663 participants, mostly elite football). It identified three domains—psychological (anxiety, fear, self-efficacy), social (therapeutic alliance, hierarchy), and contextual (season timing, resources)—that influence outcomes.

Psychological readiness was inconsistently defined and informally assessed. Both reviews call for standardized, criteria-based RTS protocols that integrate objective physical measures and psychosocial screening to improve safety and sustainability of return to sport. Additionally, the 'Strong for Life' series released a summary infographic on sarcopenia, emphasizing that supervised resistance training can modify the condition and reduce frailty and mortality in older adults.

Navigate Timescales

Each tier targets the nearest available window end date to this briefing.

Pillar Signal Heatmap

Pillar 7d Trend
Foot & Ankle Rehabilitation
Tendinopathy Management
Myofascial Release & Acupuncture
Shoulder Rehabilitation
Hip & Pelvic Girdle
General MSK & Emerging Research
Treatment Protocol Formulation

Intensity is derived from pillar keyword overlap with headline, summary, key signals, and themes for each horizon.

Trend uses last 4 entries in this 7-day timescale (rightmost point is current).

Key Signals

  • - Scoping review of 29 studies (2,187 athletes) found 82.3% returned to sport after shoulder stabilization; only 45% used objective strength/ROM testing.
  • - Latarjet procedure showed lower recurrent instability (3.1%) than Bankart repair (9.2%).
  • - Clearance criteria after shoulder stabilization lack standardization; few studies included functional or psychological readiness tests.
  • - Hamstring strain RTS review (10 studies, n=663) identified three domains: psychological, social, and contextual factors.
  • - Psychological readiness after hamstring injury is inconsistently defined and informally assessed; structured screening recommended.
  • - Social factors such as therapeutic alliance and hierarchical pressures influence RTS decisions after hamstring strain.
  • - Sarcopenia infographic (Part 3 of 'Strong for Life') highlights resistance training as a key modifiable intervention for frailty prevention.

Top Themes

rts-criteria shoulder-stabilization functional-testing psychological-readiness hamstring-rehabilitation sarcopenia-diagnosis resistance-training shared-decision-making

Key References

  1. Return-to-Sport Rates and Clearance Criteria After Bankart and Laterjet Shoulder Stabilization: Scoping Review Findings [rss]

    First scoping review quantifying RTS rates and clearance criteria after shoulder stabilization in athletes.

  2. Psycho-social-contextual factors in return to sport after hamstring strain injuries: a scoping review [rss]

    High-quality scoping review mapping underappreciated psychosocial factors in hamstring RTS.

  3. Sarcopenia Summary Infographic: Part 3 of Strong for Life Series (2026) [BJSM Blog — Front Page Listing]

    Practical infographic for sarcopenia diagnosis and intervention in older adults.